If all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed what would you pass on?
seedmagazine.com
seedmagazine.com
I'd pass along the idea of the scientific method, that through observation, hypothesis, and testing we can advance knowledge in a cumulative way.
Ever heard of the Watts/Strogatz model? ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_and_Strogatz_model
I particularly enjoyed Steven Strogatz's phrase which attempts to encapsulate calculus and thus impart the mathematical underpinnings that Newton did--thus providing for the first time that leap in predictive powers of human-created models that spurred the belief in our ability to truly understand the world around us.
That is, it's one of the few phrases that I think would generate the impetus for further study, rather than relying on that drive to be there.
In that environment, the seed phrase would essentially be a message from supernatural beings. It would need to be simple enough not to get distorted beyond recognition when it is orally transferred by nomadic tribes in the desert who are likely to be more interested in instructions concerning circumcision and goat-slaughter than the details of double-helix molecules (think Bible, Quran).
That should be just sufficient... ;-)
The Chinese had printing technology long before Gutenberg, but it did not spread to Europe, nor the Middle East where the Islamic culture was intellectually advanced. It was only after the Renaissance that the cultural and political atmosphere was ripe for mass distribution of accumulated knowledge and dissenting opinion.