Why then? Why not any other chat app, or even messenger with far greater reach and just as many resources?
Why then? Why not any other chat app, or even messenger with far greater reach and just as many resources?
In fact, Bolsonaro used WhatsApp spam as part of his election campaign strategy[1].
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/30/whatsapp-fake-...
It was pretty much the days of AIM and MSN. When the rest of the world was on MSN. US was still on AIM.
Without the China Market WhatsApp has 1.6B user.
Outside of WhatsApp (2 Billion Monthly Active Users), Messenger (1.4 Billion MAU) and WeChat (1.2 Billion MAU) the others stand little chance of building and benefiting from being a platform.
Setting aside WeChat and China, if you now look at the next billion users who are going to be using the internet for the first time, WhatsApp is the lens through which they see the internet - they communicate, consume news and entertainment, buy and sell things, get medical advice, even fall in love via WhatsApp.
In India, where a significant portion of that #nextbillion are gonna come from, Messenger has ~100M users and WhatsApp has ~500M MAU. Similar multiples play out in "WhatsApp first" markets like Latin America, most parts of Asia.
Case in Point: Even though it had nothing to do with our business, we recently helped hack together a solution to conduct two, 20-question, exams for 100K students in an Indian State. Simply because every family had WhatsApp (and nothing else). Messenger simply doesn't have the reach in the emerging world.