Hacker News Reader

Every public platform would look exactly like your email's spam folder if they weren't expected to moderate anything.

> as such they are not expected to moderate anything

When even the president's tweets have been squelched or tagged, I highly doubt that anyone reasonably familiar with Twitter over the last couple of years would have that expectation.

> because they are used as a public platform . . . they are not expected to moderate anything

Says who?

> because they are biased in their censorship

Yes, and reality has a liberal bias, eh?

There is no legal requirement for a "public platform" (this is not a legal term) to be unmoderated or "neutral". You've been misinformed.