Rust - 15/2462
C - 71/2462
Go - 105/2462
Kotlin - 109/2462
Typescript - 147/2462
C++ - 193/2462
C# - 221/2462
Java - 544/2462 Rust - 15/2462
C - 71/2462
Go - 105/2462
Kotlin - 109/2462
Typescript - 147/2462
C++ - 193/2462
C# - 221/2462
Java - 544/2462The ecosystem needs to settle and stabilize a bit more before it reaches deep adoption in the industry as a whole. If you're a lean "disruptive" start up then you probably don't mind using more experimental technologies but big, established companies like to have a more long term vision. You don't want to have to rewrite half of your software 5 years from now because nobody uses FancyLang anymore.
the failure of rust was it tried to start from scratch where better solution would be to seamlessly integrate into c,
maybe if gcc has support for compiling rust the future switchover on embedded would be easier
So what's the point? Python was created in 1991, in 2000 was more popular than Rust is today. Rust was created in 2010, so it is older and in a world where it has to compete with more languages. Reality is different of what you wish to be true.