I'd be interested to see statistics on how many people die at these intersections, I suspect this is one of the needlessly dangerous aspects of driving in cities.
I'd be interested to see statistics on how many people die at these intersections, I suspect this is one of the needlessly dangerous aspects of driving in cities.
Or if you're worried about colorblind people, use patterns. Fill one lane with random dots and another lane with random stars.
Big potential for accident for the right left turn lane to accidentally also turn into the same (2nd from left) lane and crash.
And NO, they don't know a priori that the leftmost lane of the street they are turning into is a left turn lane.
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.3626182,-121.8918193,3a,75y,...
They should seriously hang a HUGE sign like this and make it abundantly clear:
The (European) alternative of a simple set of rules seems more attractive: at an intersection of two different roads, the larger road has the right of way. When two same-priority roads cross, the driver on the right has the right of way. Ambiguous intersections are governed by yield signs. Only in situations where there is actual danger (bad visibility, dangerous shape of the road etc), then stop signs are used.
When they're scarce, people heed them. When they're everywhere, people instinctively determine that they're kind of meaningless, and respect them only to avoid fines from the police.
The signal for "safe to turn" is completely different, a green arrow.
It's not mandatory either. You can sit and wait if you want.