Fair market value vs. strike price
Is it typical for a strike price to be set so much above fair market value? Is it usual to not divulge that information to share holders and optionees?
Is it typical for a strike price to be set so much above fair market value? Is it usual to not divulge that information to share holders and optionees?
I mean a startup's purpose is to go from 1 to 10 or even 100, or go bust. So it's not as material whether the options are 1 or 1.25 strike if it does work out. In fact arguably you'd want more 1.25 options rather than less 1 options.
Of course that's all things equal, and the board may have screwed you on the total number of shares too.
It appears fairly common for the employees of startups to be left in the dark about lots of information about the company's financials and ownership that is known to management and investors.
Dan Luu's "options vs cash" article covers a bunch of these factors: https://danluu.com/startup-options/