Any educated opinions how bad the RISC-V problems are compared to others when looking at the big picture?
Truly innovative designs don’t actually use RISC encoding and hide the details of instruction encoding. See for example NVIDIAs PTX , which gets mapped to hardware specific instruction streams, which are nothing like a traditional RISC architecture.
To me RISC-V is another example of how open source often produces lowest common denominator copy cat versions of ideas that are 30+ years old. Just like Linux. The sad thing is that this often kills innovation and locks in suboptimal designs for a long time, because it is hard to compete against something that is free.
Aren't patents limited to 20 years? Can't you just ignore all inventions that are < 20 years old to be safe from patents? Then you'd still be 10 years ahead of POWER.
The need to be easily reachable puts constrains on the design but is also a benefit in that many people will know this ISA and be able to make tools for it.
I think I would probably recycle the Alpha ISA circa 21164 (EV-5) with maybe a CAS instruction. It was pretty balanced between hardware and software and a lot of the complications in the VLSI design (dynamic logic, mostly) are moot with a modern technology if you stick with reasonable speeds.
Presumably now that the MIPS unaligned byte access patents are expired, a whole bunch of the idiocy that Alpha had to abide to avoid that patent can just be sidestepped.