Compare sentence length distributions of famous authors
sentence-length.netlify.app
sentence-length.netlify.app
> Still leaning against the incubators he gave them, while the pencils scurried illegibly across the pages, a brief description of the modern fertilizing process; spoke first, of course, of its surgical introduction–"the operation undergone voluntarily for the good of Society, not to mention the fact that it carries a bonus amounting to six months' salary"; continued with some account of the technique for preserving the excised ovary alive and actively developing; passed on to a consideration of optimum temperature, salinity, viscosity; referred to the liquor in which the detached and ripened eggs were kept; and, leading his charges to the work tables, actually showed them how this liquor was drawn off from the test-tubes; how it was let out drop by drop onto the specially warmed slides of the microscopes; how the eggs which it contained were inspected for abnormalities, counted and transferred to a porous receptacle; how (and he now took them to watch the operation) this receptacle was immersed in a warm bouillon containing free-swimming spermatozoa–at a minimum concentration of one hundred thousand per cubic centimetre, he insisted; and how, after ten minutes, the container was lifted out of the liquor and its contents re-examined; how, if any of the eggs remained unfertilized, it was again immersed, and, if necessary, yet again; how the fertilized ova went back to the incubators; where the Alphas and Betas remained until definitely bottled; while the Gammas, Deltas and Epsilons were brought out again, after only thirty-six hours, to undergo Bokanovsky's Process.
https://twitter.com/misscrisp/status/1202792895448662016
It's really interesting how different authors play with the rhythm of their sentences - one of the best ones on here is The Raven, with very short sentences interspersed with longer ones.
If the intent is to help potential readers to estimate the difficulty of the book, then that's useful.
My friend needed a way to determine the Flesch-Kincaid readability score for a selected paragraph, and was using Microsoft Word for that. I wrote a script to automatically parse the scores for all txt files provided, then started to wonder how different books fared in that aspect, how readability scores map to language proficiency levels, and what can be told about the book in general using simple analysis tools. It was a fun project but the readability scores were far from expected — eg I hate Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and always find it frustrating to read but the readability score is actually not that low.
From a couple of stanzas in Book I, it looks like it's considered to be pretty difficult. :)
Personally I would have been more curious about authors that are known for their stylistic transgressions when it comes to text comprehensibility. Joyce and "Ulysses" come to mind.
>The agency responsible for it, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, would build the highest and largest dams in the world on rivers few believed could be controlled.
[1] https://www.planetebook.com/free-ebooks/within-a-budding-gro...
only if you ignore the logical meaning of the words and the meaning of their particular grouping.
Also everyone should read pride and prejudice because it’s funny as hell