https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQmTKxI4Wn4
It's a 7 minute video, if you only have a little time, skip around, but make sure you listen to the part starting at 6:17.
DNA isn't just the blueprint for the machine or the blueprint for the factory that makes the machine, it's the blueprint for the entire supply chain required to build and operate an entire chemical industry of mind-bending complexity. Like doubling grains of rice on each square of a checkerboard, if you wanted to create a complete catalog of all possible combinations of a string of DNA that's 150 base pairs long, you would have to marshal all of the estimated matter in the observable universe and you'd still end up short. Most of the genes that create these proteins are tens of thousands of base pairs in length and the entire human genome is ~3 billion.
Never seen the chemical (proton concentration), converted into something mechanical (spinning), and back into chemical (adp + phosphate -> atp) in such a way before.
This channel has a ton of great videos:
https://www.youtube.com/user/WEHImovies/videos
Here's one on kinetichore and mitosis (which also shows kinesin and dynein which are comically odd) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvJrDsRuWxQ
There's a collection of their DNA ones here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hk9jct2ozY
Here's another view of the ATP synthesis process that shows the chaos a bit more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5AXGS1aL8
When I think of these systematically I just wonder what the intermediate steps were. The proton pump uses energy to create the potential gradient that ATP synthase runs on. You can't have a proton gradient without the proton pump, and without the proton gradient you don't have ATP. So these two exquisitely complex machines depend on each other and had to evolve together. It boggles my mind.
Edit: Ah! Was looking for this one, sodium potassium pump - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKE8qK9UCrU This is how our neurons propagate signals. They are driven by ATP.
The membrane is the later invention, dating to organelles which are suspected to be microcellular parasites that got integrated and then reduced. These membranes were much more efficient, however they were very hard to turn off for hibernation as the membrane is a static gradient and hard to disrupt temporarily.
I wonder if maybe an intermediate step could be just channels and turbine. But no pump. If the amount of protons surrounding membrane varies over time, the cell can open the channels when there are many protons outside, and close the channels when there are few (forcing equalization through turbines).
Or maybe it can use acid protolysis to create protons?
This one has a little more, even if a lot of questions still remain https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEefVREZ1Ao
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Genome-Autobiography-Species-23-Cha...
Even that is only theoretical - we generally know some level of detail to know what many of these routines are approximately up to, but rarely in the detail needed to figure out what a cell is up to in general.
In some ways studying what a cell is upto using our current methods is comparable in certainty to how we poll the US before elections.
The fun part is that it's not like DNA is just expressed, it needs to be "unwound" from it's natural state as a highly dense structure. Elements within the cell actually regulate the unwinding itself, that's one way genes are turn on/off.
And in addition, once DNA is unwound, split into a single strand and transcribed into RNA, the RNA itself becomes a regulating mechanism through siRNA. So the very act of transcribing DNA has regulating effect up the transcribing itself.
(If for some reason we had to work with that kind of computer we'd probably enforce a conventional, graspable approach on it by finding a way to simulate a conventional computer once and then conveniently forget about the underlying madness, clearly that wouldn't be the path taken by evolution)