Hacker News Reader

cactus2093

Forced to watch an ad != forced to vote a certain way.

And again, a threat implies it is done maliciously. You think it would be better if the companies just stayed quiet, and then just out of blue one day said "sorry we're shutting down operations, you're all out of jobs"?

View on HN

Forcing drivers to watch the ad was a means of persuading them to support Prop 22. Hence, they were coerced to support Prop 22.

Persuasion via force is exactly in line with the definition that you gave.

They get coerced to watch ads, not coerced to vote a certain way or have a certain opinion. The reason they started supporting prop 22 after watching the ad is that prop 22 gave them minimum wage and healthcare without being employees, which is exactly what most drivers wants.

The original commenter said they were coerced into working as campaign volunteers, not coerced to vote.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com