or instead of dismissing people's grievances as illogical, you can skip the strawman phase and engage with the real issues as I and others have described here
They then ask:
> Can someone explain what this description misses and where the harm comes from?
In answer, maybe no harm is actually done. But even so, people will perceive that they have been harmed. And in the larger context of this thread, that is why people are sometimes unhappy with their community being improved, because they believe it will price them out and harm them.
Maybe cows can fly. Maybe a lot of things. But it does cause harm. So your idea about people's perceptions seems condescending