In Oracle's fight with open source, the good guys won -- this time
javaworld.com
javaworld.com
To me it seems more likely that Oracle couldn't figure out a way to make money out of it and got shot of it in such a way that caused least backlash and left the least possible blame attached or Oracle in future - now the community is solely to blame for any future failings.
Just my take of course, but I don't personally feel like "Open Source" has won any fight here - I don't think Oracle would even acknowledge there was a fight.
It can still become a "win" if the remaining contributors are able to manage the project more efficiently than Sun or Oracle did, and attract enough new contributors to compensate for the loss. But that is far from given.
The actual code of the open source projects Oracle took over is almost unimportant. They acquired powerful brand names, then discarded the communities. In case of Open Office at least, the community value was greater than the brand name.
That Oracle gave up that project so fast, actually makes me think, that they just found another way to make money out of the situation.
While I do support open source and think it's an excellent medium for exchanging new ideas/software, I am unable to see LibreOffice as anything beyond a facsimile of Microsoft's commercial offering.