Of all of the morally-dubious technologies in the world today, this seems like a force of unequivocal good, and yet the criticism is endless: "it's not healthier", "the name sucks", "it'll give you cancer".
All of these just seem to be missing the point that it's _no worse than meat_ in most respects, and _way better_ in others (i.e. ethical and environmental impact).
A recent parallel could be vaping: It had rediculously overblown criticisms for quite a while, to the point where some smokers were telling folks (unironically) that it wasn't safe and they shouldn't do it.
The idea that the plant based alternative is not natural when compared to meat that is grown in animals that we have seen for many lifetimes.
Similar to "I let my body build natural immunity, rather than take a chemically laced vaccine"
Think about what you wrote. Plant-based "meat". Would you eat a meat based salad that was created in a lab?
> "it's not healthier", "the name sucks", "it'll give you cancer".
It's not healthier, it's name does suck and god knows what it will give you. It's the most inorganic lab grown processed burger you can possibly have.