A doctor and medical ethicist argues life after 75 is not worth living
technologyreview.com
technologyreview.com
The world is better for her being in it.
> Lots of presidents and lots of politicians say, “Children are our most valuable resource.” But we as a country don’t behave like that. We don’t invest in children the way we invest in adults, especially older adults. One of the statistics I like to point out is if you look at the federal budget, $7 goes to people over 65 for every dollar for people under 18.
The "economic" argument for a "Logan's Run Carousel" for those reaching 40 is even stronger.
"These people who live a vigorous life to 70, 80, 90 years of age—when I look at what those people “do,” almost all of it is what I classify as play. It’s not meaningful work."
According to this "ethicist", the lives of non-productive, non-creative people should not be supported/extended by medicine.
Try telling that to Medicare recipients, those that retired in their 50s, families with members with special needs, the homeless, those with long term disabilities, manufacturing skills that cannot find employment, in the coal industry, with PTSD and mental health issues, addicted to Sacklers' poison. Why stop there? Why not argue that work is not meaningful unless one makes more than minimum wage or at least a living wage.
That is a dystopian future that sounds to me more like Logan's Run than anything else.
Will he argue that those over 70 should be the last to be vaccinated? That seems like a likely conclusion to make.