Most importantly: we need to start treating drug addiction, and long term pain, as the public health emergencies they are and we need to stop criminalising drug addicts.
> Diversion investigations involve, but are not limited to, practitioners and mid-level practitioners who write prescriptions for no legitimate medical need and/or outside the scope of legitimate medical practice, or sell prescriptions to drug dealers or abusers; pharmacists who falsify records and subsequently sell or abuse the drugs; pharmacists who fill prescriptions that they knew or should have known were illegitimate; employees who steal from inventory and falsify records to cover illicit sales; prescription forgers; and individuals who commit armed robbery of pharmacies and drug distributors
The US does massively over-prescribe opioids. There have been doctors who were careless in who they prescribed to. There have been "pill mills" https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/02/opioids-west...
But they don't need patient ID to track that down. They can use supplier data.
I'm also struggling to read the document. It's written in a specific, jargon heavy, way. Use of the word "subpoena" every time they mention patient data is a little bit reassuring, but it's still not great.
> CLIN 2001 Unlimited access to patient de-identified data, to be identified via subpoena, for class 2 to 5 prescription data which includes pharmacy, medical, and dental data. Fixed price per license per month
I'm still ploughing through the 60 pages to try to get my head around it.