- Beaker https://github.com/beakerbrowser/beaker/issues/1749
- Min https://github.com/minbrowser/min/issues/868
- Agregore https://github.com/AgregoreWeb/agregore-browser/issues/65
From what I can tell, it's really any browser not well known by Google.
If he removes the UA spoofing, all Google sites break because Google use this to determine if they run their services (which is incredibly weird to me).
If he doesn't, then his browser is banned. Somewhat of a double bind.
The most charitable explanation here is that Google is a megacorp now, and the right hand and left hand are on different continents and aren't aware of each others existence.
Google shouldn't wield the power to decide which browsers are worthy enough to access the larger internet they have control over. It's antithetical to the open web.
Merely restricting their own sign-in service impacts over 1.5 billion people. Of course, most are unaffected.
I think I've already seen one app that did that to me. It was clunky and broke the illusion that the app was native -- though I guess that's a pretty thin illusion anyway.