You go in, get to handle the actual product. Then, if you decide to buy, do it there via the stores affiliate link. If not, you pay the store $N on your way out.
That way the customer gets the price they want, and the store makes some money for letting them handle things.
Also helps that Apple is vertically integrated and has tight control over it's supply chain and applies MAP very uniformly.
I was thinking the same as I scanned down this thread, but I can't get past two things: 1) It's tough to for me (the customer) to have enough confidence that the showroom has all the options I should consider, and that the showroom employees are knowledgeable about them all. Without that, it's tough to commit to a flat price for browsing before I enter. 2) I can't see how this happens one store at a time. As long as there are traditional retail locations nearby, ones that let customers browse for free, customers will gravitate there. Can this business model succeed only once traditional brick and mortar retail has disappeared?
It's interesting. The online marketplace (Amazon) controls the return policy, but the sellers control the pricing. That's not necessarily a bad thing. Unfortunately, it's distorted (particularly in the case of Amazon) by the proliferation of fake brands. And by fake brands, I do not mean fakes of well-known brands...I mean meaningless brands that do not exist, that attempt to create product differentiation that does not exist.
It's turned Amazon into the crap-pile of last resort, for me.