Hacker News Reader

Comment by mayukh | Hacker News Reader

Its a step in the right direction. Traditional responses to the market failures, corruption, fraud and general seediness of those in power has been more regulation. And that hasn't really worked too well has it..

What we need is transparency, while protecting privacy. Shining a bright light into the dark corners of wrong-doing should serve as a better deterrent than any ambiguous, unenforceable regulation.

Lets hope the safehouse gets some competition (nytimes are you listening?)

View on HN

Leaking stuff to newspapers is a time-honoured tradition. But with an anonymous upload site it can be done much more easily.

The biggest problem I see is fake leaks. Make up some fake documents to embarrass someone you don't like (or just for the sake of the lulz) and how are they supposed to verify whether they're real or not before publishing 'em?

By doing their job. Much of journalism is research.

But that doesn't help. If I have in my hand what is supposedly a top-secret document then how do I confirm whether it's real or not? (Let's assume that the forgers haven't made any obvious mistakes.) I sure as hell can't go knocking on the door and asking whether I can compare this document with the original version.

A great example was the Rather-gate memos from the 2004 election, a supposedly "leaked" memo which got published with great fanfare despite the fact that the forgers did make some obvious errors (ie producing a 1970s document in Microsoft Word using default fonts, spacing and parameters). But if the forgers hadn't been complete dumbasses then how would we have ever known whether they were real?

Unfortunately, unless you can verify them, you don't publish them. That does mean that some things that are genuine will not get published. But it avoids what's worse -- publishing things that aren't true.

Yes, that's the way it should work. It's not the way that they do, though.

Heck, has a single Wikileaks document ever been proven to be genuine?

In an interview during the wikileaks stuff, I believe the managing editor of NYTimes said they were considering a wikileaks site like this.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com