How does it compare with the rohloff system?
Anyways it seems to be significantly more expensive thus I don't think it will become widespread.
Anyways it seems to be significantly more expensive thus I don't think it will become widespread.
The rohloff system is quite heavy though, so I don't know if it's "more efficient" than a traditional high end sprocket-and-chain system. The rohloff also shifts the weight to the rear of the bike. Maybe the pinion gear box system might be better since its weight is low and towards the center of the bike.
> All of that is working, too, with independent tests showing properly race-prepped drivetrains to be as much as 98% efficient.
> That elusive 2%
> As good as chain optimization has become, there comes a point where there’s no more optimizing left to do, and there are no other options but to rethink the system.
Though, not as in any modern drivetrain but high-end competition drivetrains. At least I imagine it would be with really expensive solutions like Ceramic Speed bearings everywhere.
Having bike toured, keeping a chain halfway clean (or at least not muddy) is not hard. Yes, I see the appeal of an internally geared hub, but marginal differences in efficiency either way would not be high on my list of concerns.
[0] https://cyclingtips.com/2020/05/how-many-watts-does-a-dirty-...
It can be used with the Rohloff system. But, I think you need a compatible chain ring since they are talking about a new tooth design requirements. The Rohloff system has the chain ring attached to the hub gear. So you presumably have to change that chain ring yourself.