If you're not allowed to conclude that the whole system has to go, then it is impossible to have any credibility in saying that the whole system doesn't have to go.
If you're not allowed to conclude that the whole system has to go, then it is impossible to have any credibility in saying that the whole system doesn't have to go.
I would also like to say the idea that this system has to be changed/replaced is generally agreed upon.
As a Chinese national and frequent Zhihu user, this comment is probably satire... I would also like to say the idea that this system has to be changed/replaced is generally agreed upon.
Have not heard about this. What ideas are floating around for the replacement?
Also not sure what you exactly mean with "generally agreed upon" and "has to be changed/replaced". There could be varying degrees of interpretation, but I don't think by far that a radical change is a "general consensus" throughout the nation. Many do see that the system has been working for the country so far and are taking note.
I come across a lot of such people online. The same bureaucratic disease of any established government.