Hacker News Reader

In this case, the author did submit a DMCA takedown request, but the Github user then submitted a DMCA counter notification stating that, under penalty of perjury, they have a good faith believe that the takedown is invalid.

As I understand it (and I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice), the only next step available is to use the US court system to sue for copyright infringement and perjury.

View on HN

> In this case, the author did submit a DMCA takedown request, but the Github user then submitted a DMCA counter notification stating that, under penalty of perjury, they have a good faith believe that the takedown is invalid

Are we sure of that? GitHub publishes the notices and counter-notices. I can't find any notices there that appear to be for that repository, nor any relevant counter-notices.

I wonder if the author may have sent his request through some other channel than GitHub's DMCA takedown request form?

oh, I see, thanks. :(

it is true that in past issues, the mob would be mad if Github did anything different.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com