Isn't the first thing they tell you about guns something like "don't point it at anything you don't intend to destroy"? How does a trained officer hear that two children are in the house and not immediately de-escalate? This is insanity.
Isn't the first thing they tell you about guns something like "don't point it at anything you don't intend to destroy"? How does a trained officer hear that two children are in the house and not immediately de-escalate? This is insanity.
Unfortunately the police shoot kids fairly routinely, as lawyer Greg Doucette shows in this twitter thread.
https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1336132653481865217
Considering the sheer number of killings, this can and really should be reported in much a similar way to a protracted war, as it does look very much to be an extended attack upon civilians by an armed forces of sorts.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/08/warrior-cop-clas...
No surprise. Even after years of training many, if not most, police officers miss close-up shots more often than they hit. There's a surveillance video somewhere of a security guard and a perp shooting their firearms at each other from about 3 feet apart: they miss every shot. One had a revolver and the other a semi-automatic. It is somewhat reminiscent of the "apartment scene" in Pulp Fiction but even wilder and less believable:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6YBKdmOlM8
Shooting a target at a range is very different from drawing and shooting at real people who are moving toward/away from you, possibly with ill intent and possibly armed.
For police, entering a building with a search warrant is not something to be done with a firearm holstered. You have no idea what you're up against in that situation.
This is a ridiculous rationalization that could be applied to literally anyone or anything.