Why should any random claim be called a "proof"? Should flat earth videos get the same equivalent as NASA programming?
Why should we, as society, give equal weight to people like yourself who have "no interest in doing that research"?
Why should any random claim be called a "proof"? Should flat earth videos get the same equivalent as NASA programming?
Why should we, as society, give equal weight to people like yourself who have "no interest in doing that research"?
If you are trying to incite a civil war, this is a good way to help push it along by silencing people.
If you can prevent the former by removing viral reach of the latter, isn't that a net win? It's sad that a private company has to do it, but one could argue that it's the morally correct thing to do, in this case.
These people are free to host their videos on Parler / Gab / etc, and broadcast this nonsense without the free mainstream reach.
I've been rather unpopularly predicting an eventual civil war for about 5 years on HN, maybe a bit longer. Predicting is one thing; if you're suggesting that others are inciting it, as you did above, then your analysis should be a bit broader and more inclusive.