> Your original statement was: "the common view of "underpaid" being a view that isn't consistent with the history of the space."

No wriggling. :)

To me, that statement would be backed by evidence that DoorDash allows drivers to make more than they previously made as drivers for specific restaurants.

To you, that wouldn’t satisfy the notion that they are fairly paid, because you believe they have always been underpaid.

I’m looking at “underpaid” through a lens of historical data, but you’re looking at it through a different lens, so I asked how you define underpaid.

Do you see what I mean?