The engineers wouldn’t recommend another brand of router which may be better because they’d lose their perks and face difficulty moving to another job.
It’s a self sustaining industry.
No surprise Amazon want the same thing.
The engineers wouldn’t recommend another brand of router which may be better because they’d lose their perks and face difficulty moving to another job.
It’s a self sustaining industry.
No surprise Amazon want the same thing.
In theory yes but in practice Juniper ate 30% of Cisco's market overnight when they showed up with better core routers for ISPs, and all the CCNx's happily got Juniper certified too.
When I do come across it, it’s either telecom vendor owned, or the small business stuff which is re-branded Linksys or some other garbage.
Even the re-branded small business lines are almost double what the competition costs. But, it sells because “it’s Cisco” and it’s not $3,000 a switch.
This is not always true and people are downvoting you...
> No surprise Amazon want the same thing.
...but this is the important point: lock-in