If you're a nerdy high schooler: Don't let that be you.
If you're a nerdy high schooler: Don't let that be you.
So yes, I strongly advice any high school student from any economic background to apply.
Edit: changed "keeled" to "need" in first sentence; damn phone auto-complete!
I went with the liberal arts school, and haven't been disappointed. I'll have debt, but I've have a job lined up to pay it off.
MIT makes it clear that they want you there regardless of whether you can pay. I definitely recommend that any high school student who's interested and passionate about technology apply, and not weigh the cost too heavily in considering where to go.
It really doesn't hurt to apply - I got my aid package before I had to decided to commit to any school.
A friend of mine did 4 years at a state school of little note, but absolutely did excel at it. He also paid almost no tuition. He now has a full ride at the graduate school at MIT.
This "first in village" hack can save you hundreds of thousands. Obviously, you have to put in the work in any case.
Although if their rejection letter is like CalTech's (roughly "We receive many more qualified applications than we have slots for", Heinlein even commented on the letter's quality in his "what you have to do to get into a good university" book, Have Space Suit, Will Travel), if you don't get in you won't know where they judged you to be.
One last bit of info: MIT really likes evidence that you can projects. Beside geographic diversity it's pretty clear that's what made the difference for me in 1979.