It's similar. libdispatch is primarily a task queue to simplify and optimize multithreaded workloads in objc/swift. Tokio uses a similar task queue pattern for scheduling cpu-bound or blocking io, but the main feature is an non-blocking/asynchronous IO runtime. Overall, it's more similar to libuv (the async io library that powers node.js), but with built-in support for Rust's async/await syntax

Yes in some regards. Both offer eventloops (in GCD: dispatch queues), which run small chunks of code which belongs to independent tasks on the same thread.

However there are some differences:

- Tokio is focussed on running async/await based code, whereas libdispatch currently mostly targets running callbacks/continuations. This might change once Swift offers async/await support, which for sure could run on top of GCD queues.

- GCD queues provide a lot more fine-grained control. users can exactly specify on which queue to run some code on. And tasks can jump between code. There might also be a dedicated main thread (UI) queue. Tokio just spins up a single queue which runs all code, which might be empowered by a multithreaded executor. This makes it less usable for UI.

Yes, but it's strictly userspace. It's more like the concurrency primitives in the JVM. (Eg. work-stealing threadpool, timers, various abstractions over OS/kernel lower level async stuff.)

To me it's kind of like the event loop of node.js (which I believe comes from libuv)?