I’m not sure what the defined red lines are in the US, but most people building rockets big enough for the feds to worry about are following the model rocketry code and associated with NAR/Tripoli, so at least have access to more expertise to help follow the rules.
Getting the big motors requires multiple certs from those orgs, so the system tends to be self regulating to some extent, since you can’t test your code without the hardware.
I know Joe Barnard of BPS has mentioned a few times that he doesn’t release his code because the laws are unclear, and lawyers familiar with them are expensive.
The issue isn't you building a rocket big enough for the feds to care about, but the people who can build (and use) big rockets using your designs. Iran for example relies heavily on open source for its drone program.
HP for example is still heavily involved in the investigation of Huawei's export of HP hardware to Iran. They didn't get to just point and say "go talk to them."
[0] https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/former-raytheon-engineer-...
I think I’ve made the emotional pivot to UAVs instead because swarming and autonomous guidance & control is one of the more interesting parts to me and even if it weren’t likely to draw ’attention’, the development process for rocket is stymied by the characteristics of rocket propulsion.
I've thought about getting back into the hobby and it looks like all the hybrid systems have disappeared. The ATF permitting for solid fuel motors seemed pretty onerous back in the late 90s (I always flew at launches where I could purchase reloads for my Aerotech RMS on-site so I didn't have to deal with transporting motors) and I assume it got worse after 9/11.
Anybody know what ever happened to the hybrid systems? Aerotech's website looks like it stopped being updated about the time I left the hobby. Same goes w/ their competitor Hypertek (which I thought had a ridiculous ground-support system).
This is such a hilarious phrasing but it nicely captures the feeling!