The Five Whys specifically does not stop at a single root cause or fault, that's why it's the five why's and not the one.
Moreover, robustness cannot emerge from a single event no matter how much you analyze it. It comes from continuous improvement processes, quality assurance, war games, service level analysis, etc. It's a multi-headed hydra of efforts to improve a system. One of those things is RCA of service-impacting events, or manufacturing defects, or customer complaints.
This is like those "considered harmful" blog posts so fashionable a few years ago. So it turns out that if you blindly and inaccurately follow a generic process, it might not work out great. Who knew? It's almost like there might be subtlety involved.