Overall, the project was a massive failure, and a political party that's in the minority isn't the reason.
Overall, the project was a massive failure, and a political party that's in the minority isn't the reason.
(I’m much more aware of the California HSR project than most people on the Internet.)
It doesn't achieve any of the goals it set out to do, is way way over budget, and has been axed by the governor. That's a failure in my book...
That is, unless your definition of success is any mile of track laid, regardless of how it's used? That's a weird definition of success, if I may say so.
As-is, people will need to drive 2.5 hours from SF to Merced, wait for a train, take a 1.5 hour train ride to Bakersfield, then rent a car and drive another 1.5 hours from Bakersfield to LA.
All that saves about 1 hour of travel time (at the most!)... but requires renting a car, gas, etc.
Basically, this thing is completely useless. Finally the government realized this and cancelled the entire project.
Yet, the California Tax Payers that voted for the $30 Billion Bond Measure will continue to pay the extra taxes for decades to come...
You definitely don’t get high speed rail if you don’t build any.
I'd love to have a HSR in California - but it has to be built for a reasonable budget, and support itself with ticket fares, and go to destinations people actually want. Otherwise, it's just a waste.