What’s Entering Public Domain in 2021: The Great Gatsby, Music by Duke Ellington
openculture.com
openculture.com
The actual list the article references... (and strangely, mostly plagiarizes?)
For my part, I added two newly available non-Conan Robert E. Howard stories to our shorts compilation: https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/robert-e-howard/short-fict...
its a low effort gag.
If we're we're inundated with low quality fan films, Cinemas simply wouldn't screen them. At the very least, we'd have a chance to see alternative interpretations and tellings of stories involving some of our favorite characters.
I'd rather see a passion project set in the Star Wars IP than any of the recent multi-million dollar films.
I generally agree, though I thought Rogue One was pretty good.
I'd love to watch a Star Wars movie with a budget under 10 million.
It's actually pretty great. For all the wrong reasons, but that doesn't detract from its greatness.
There are a few near-future scenarios that intersect in interesting ways:
The possibility of life extending interventions such that average life expectancy climbs first toward, and then perhaps past, the century mark (life-of-the-author plus anything starts to look ridiculous).
The possibility of uploading whether it is a true digitization/emulation or 'just' a simulation of a particular consciousness given enough data.
Cryogenic preservation and revivification.
Legal decisions on whether such events count as 'death' for purposes of copyright, debt, inheritance, etc.
Legal decisions on the personhood and potential emancipation of digitizations, simulations, emulations, etc.
Legal decisions on the criminal and civil culpability of such simulations etc. (if considered persons, or their owners if not) for their originals' acts (such as copyright infringement).
The copyright status of works created post-mortem by such entities, whether they are considered persons or not (such works might simply be considered or passed-off as 'unpublished', for example)
If nothing else, I'm pretty sure that there will be attempts to hack around any legal uncertainty with various permutations and combinations of corporate personhood, copyright assignment, work-for-hire agreements, and smart contracts to get to some desired result regardless of how the legal environment changes, but those still might fail in 'interesting' ways.
All of which is to say that we might very well get in to a situation where it is possible to provide incentives for the creation of new works by dead authors, legally speaking. At which point the public, and the public domain, will be well and truly screwed over.
Personally, I'm rather more concerned about the works that will be lost because they are owned.
BTW, would it surprise you to learn that Spider Robinson is a copyright maximalist?
I think this wrongful take on what capitalism should and shouldn't be allowed to take from the public domain, and why to detract from your comment. However, not as much as the incorrect take on history: Many people capitalized on works in the public domain before the Mickey Mouse taking laws. Please grace us with better research the future. This has been too typical.
This created a complications because lots of classical works that were in the public domain had to be removed from sites like Project Gutenberg. Apparently, popular, long dead authors are supposed to support their great grandkids from those royalty checks.
I wrote a school book report on The Great Gatsby from the text hosted on Project Gutenberg. And when I had an interest in looking at the text again imagine my surprise to find it no longer listed.
I don't know whether to feel honored that my playing was decent enough to be (mis-)recognized by the algorithm as a professional artist or sad that I got muted.
(One reason why copyright might not have applied to software is that it's "just" a set of instructions. We're seeing this argument repeated at some level with the Google-Oracle tiff over APIs.)
After all India was all set for the TPP, and it included those copyright provisions...
I’m not even mad either. No high schooler can possibly relate to that book in any meaningful way. Good forbid an English teacher picks a book palatable to high schoolers.
“no high schooler can possibly relate to that book in any meaningful way” yes nobody has ever had messed up feelings about social status or unrequited love or what are you talking about
Cheap paperbacks containing just the story and which cost just above the cost of its paper and ink. Slightly fancier versions with introductions by literary scholars. Thick annotated editions with every allusion and reference explained with lengthy footnotes.