Hacker News Reader

Comment by wodenokoto | Hacker News Reader

I find the mixing of iMessages and sms' in the same app super confusing. Good on you for knowing which color is which, but most of my friends who are fairly good with computers and internet, don't really understand what is going on.

I think Google tried the same and the Android audience were less forgiving and I think Android is better off because of that.

I would have loved to have SMS and iMessage separate. I use SMS less because of iMessage. When I switched to my Android phone, some people would text me in iMessage and the messages would end up on my iPad, where I had asked for all iMessage notification to be turned off, because I want to receive SMS on my phone.

View on HN

What's confusing about it? I'm honestly confused by your confusion. When I want to message someone, I use Messages. Whether they have an iPhone or not is irrelevant, because that will be handled in the background.

It's relevant when falling back to SMS would cost you $$$. Not something I have to worry about in the US, but I understand some areas are different (a parent comment mentioned Brazil).

But you know before you even send the message if it will go over iMessage or SMS based on the color.

wodenokoto’s post specifically mentioned not knowing which color is for which service. That’s the confusing part. I can’t recall off the top of my head, either, so I tend to agree.

I find it pretty incredible that anyone who posts on HN and uses an iPhone doesn't know blue vs. green. If you go up to any random iPhone user on the street and mention "green texters" there's a very good chance they will know exactly what you're talking about.

You keep repeating that color does it for you and other people keep repeating that it does not work for them. Suspend your disbelief. This is no Mensa puzzle, people’s brains just work differently.

The color is just one of the indicators. There is text which indicates whether it is iMessage or a Text message as well.

It has the color and also says “text message” or “imessage” over the message. Its pretty clear.

It's even clearer on WhatsApp, because every message is sent over the internet and never via SMS.

Yes & therefore, if someone isn't on WhatsApp, the message doesn't send at all.

> It's relevant when falling back to SMS would cost you $$$.

Then disable the fallback... It's a very obvious and simple setting.

Once someone knows about it or find out about charges, sure. But see how many people get hit with accidental roaming charges even though there's a simple and obvious setting to disable it.

As someone who doesn't currently use an iPhone... isn't Messages the only approved SMS app for iOS? What happens if you attempt to message a non-iMessage user with that setting disabled?

Then it'll send as a text message.

When initiating a new conversation, the number you add to it appears blue if they can receive iMessages, green if not.

If for some reason iMessages can't be delivered to the receiving party at the moment. Text messages are used as a fallback for them. If you disable the fallback mode. It won't be.

The whole thing is kinda intuitive, and works really smooth IMHO.

In iMessage, before one starts typing, the text field says either “iMessage” or “text message”, so one knows how it’ll be sent without relying on the blue/green color scheme.

I miss hangouts SMS integration. It was super easy toggle SMS/Hangouts as the method of sending and clearly displayed grey if it was going to be SMS.

It clearly says “sent as text”when it’s green. There really is no confusion and takes a second to understand.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com