Pictures at various times during their youth, vacations, with family members, and proof of employment by being on a selective school/employer’s website may very well be less random than taking a sperm bank’s word for it.
Who's going to validate all that information? I would assume a (hypothetical) impartial third party who's paid by the sperm buyer. That same third party might even offer services like testing the sperm for diseases, storing it for future use if the donor travels, etc. Which is basically reinventing a sperm bank.
The person receiving the sperm would be the person spending their time sifting through the donor’s social media for proof.
The comment I responded to referred to cutting out middlemen and meeting with the donors directly.
As mentioned in the article, most men only offer AI.
Took me a moment to parse that acronym. AI = artificial insemination.
Why do you assume that? It could also be that they provide a whitepaper and complementary pytorch model along with the service ;-)
It's defined that way in the article
Yay I know I was a unique guy, being neither artificial nor intelligent!