For example, the MPAA does not require Apple to block movie purchases or playback on jailbroken iPhones or Apple TVs. Maybe that something overlooked in the Apple contacts that they've gotten a chance to correct in their deals with Google?
For example, the MPAA does not require Apple to block movie purchases or playback on jailbroken iPhones or Apple TVs. Maybe that something overlooked in the Apple contacts that they've gotten a chance to correct in their deals with Google?
The players that make those kinds of decisions are:
a) distributors/sellers like Google, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Hulu
b) owners of the content that license this content to distributors (i.e. movie studios, tv networks etc.)
A decision like that might have been made by a distributor, out of their own volition, or forced on the distributor by a content owner via contract.
Who do you think "b" is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_A...
They influence under what conditions content can be played on a device. Consider the case of CableCARD, where a device manufacturer has to have their hardware and OS certified before they will be allowed to make a device and distribute drivers for it.
A consortium of cable providers enforces that requirement, but ultimately, content producers are the ones demanding these restrictions (like the various copy restriction flags).