The data is public now—if you're so certain, go find me a single post on Parler calling for mass executions.
Easily done:
https://imgur.com/gallery/nHb2lO8
Some of these are Verified users - Parler has their Drivers License and Social Security number, and yet they still felt secure in brazenly violating the law like this.
I do not think "literally millions" do. That is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence.
I am saddened by extremists like this, on all sides.
I want to win a tough but fair political fight, and I think that's what almost everyone in America wants, too. I'm sorry some people think 60 court cases were simultaneously wrongly decided, but I don't feel sympathy for anyone who thinks the next step is to storm the Capitol.
Unfortunately the service is down, but I would imagine that other post was removed as well.
The question we were discussing was whether or not many of the USERS are calling for mass executions.
I provided ample evidence, despite your "find me a single post" challenge.
Now we might want to engage in a different discussion, about whether Parler was correctly moderating that content. But that is not a "clarification," that's a new topic.
I do not have access to information about how long content was allowed to remain before it was removed. Do you?
I will admit that it's draining, talking to one user who keeps moving the goal-posts.
And I will then say that I think it's their intention to drain people like me.
So I try to shrug it off and keep refuting arguments with the evidence they pretend they will be convinced by.
It's clear that you are arguing in good faith and the other person who keeps moving the goalposts and demanding more proof is not, and moreover it's very enlightening to see this scenarios played out nearly identically whenever I lurk and follow a discussion between the left and right in US politics.
You can't usually "win" the argument, just your own time.
> single post
> on Parler
> calling for mass executions
I still think these are not legit death threats by the content of it. Saying things like “a good commie is a dead a commie” might be tasteless but it’s far from being a serious thing. No one is killing communists in the US.
https://imgur.com/gallery/nHb2lO8
Those are legit death threats. Including from a lawyer associated with the President.
> “Death to all Marxist Democrats. Take no prisoners leave no survivors!!” Chief Holland added.
How would this have to be modified to become a "legitimate death threat"?