Facebook bans Law Enforcement Today from posting

I find it funny that many people are onboard with social media companies banning speech that they dislike. This comes from both the left and right with numerous benign/extreme examples.

Meanwhile the same people supporting social media bans will scream about how traditional news (murdoch as a private example) promote speech that they don't like. Those people will also complain about the speech not allowed/censored from traditional news platforms.

So which is it? Are we talking about the rights of private companies? or are we genuinely talking about free speech? How can you have it one way for social media and another way for traditional news?

I don't think social media or traditional news monopolies should be dictating the voices we hear.

I think it's a little funny that any page getting shut off now is news. That doesn't preclude the fact that there's still lots of important things to talk about around platforms and social media and whether the bannings were good and justified, etc. Make no mistake about that.

However, just saying, it's a REALLY good time right now to make a bunch of noise if your page gets shut down...

Apparently the only revenge from the other side would work is stop selling food to SV.

I'd love if there were a list somewhere that keeps track of these shutdowns.

Donald Trump was banned from Facebook and Twitter.

Law Enforcement Today from Facebook.

Ron Paul from Facebook.

Who am I missing?

900,000 members is not nothing. But... Clearly not going to the other side of the story from Facebook or from their Twitter.