Technically it feels the same to me. Content-wise netflix is kind of a dumpster buffet, with a tons of meh stuff and a couple of really nice things. Disney has less content, but almost no low quality fluff.
Doesn't Disney own star wars nowadays. Is that sequel-mill of terrible writing really what passes for quality?
I have many qualms about The Mandalorian, but compared to the dumpster fire called the "sequel trilogy" it's very good content.
However I would agree it's seems better so far than Netflix which aims somewhat more on quantity over quality.
Regions probably vary.
Each to their own!
I mean, if you count all the content they own and you already saw before on cinema or other medias then you're right.
But after paying 1.5 years for Disney+ I think I'm paying 120 dollars a year just to watch Baby Yoda. I cannot find any other content over there really worth the Disney+ membership price.
On the other hand it's really hard for me to decide what to watch on netflix because of the amount of content I'm interested.
I wouldn't pay for Disney+ on its own, but getting it as part of a bundle with Hulu (ad free) was ok. ESPN+ is worthless.
If you don't count that then Disney+ probably isn't for you. It's ideal for parents who want a bunch of good kids movies and shows. Mandalorian, although it was the "killer app" is an outlier. The rest of the original content I've watched on there is almost literally advertisements for Disneyland. Just buy a membership for a month and watch Mando.
shrug. ymmv