The "fraction" is unknown though, with unwillingness to provide details and a vague assertions from someone that it's "fully backed". But, you know, you have to take his word for it.
You can't do this with Tether. A country's own economic reports and extensive external analysis by others can validate the financial state of a country & its fiat currency. With Tether, you have to take their word for it.
And loans? Doesn't that contradict their entire premise-- Mint 1 Tether and sell it for $1 so it's always fully backed. Loans shouldn't be necessary. Loans could be called in the second Tether shows weakness, which would further destabilize it.
And lets face it: If it's not actually fully backed $1 for $USDT then there's zero guarantee that it can't start floating against other coins or currencies. It's only worth $1 if you can find someone willing to give you $1 for $1 USDT. People claim if it loses value then Tether will simply buy up enough to drive the price back to the $1 peg. Buy it with what though? Their assets, the money backing it! which means it's then backed by even less! The only way a strategy of Tether buying the price back up to the $ peg can work at all is if Tether has more assets backing it that strictly necessary.
As for other assets backing it, they'll go up & down in value too. Even if it's currently fully backed, without transparency those other assets backing it can go down in value and then all of a sudden it's not fully backed.
All of these concerns might be moot. Tether might be completely sound, rock solid & stable. But anyone who believes that is taking it on faith based on the word of people who are highly biased & highly interested in having $USDT owners believe it, true or not, and it is unfathomable to me at this point in crypto, where shitcoins & pump & dumps and ponzi schemes and all kinds of scams persist, that anyone would take something like this on faith.