I'm going to step out on a limb here and say the outrage police are getting out of hand. Tag suggestions are incredibly useful. If I have a library of pictures (and I do), I want software to suggest tags for them. They're my pictures, FFS.
I'm going to step out on a limb here and say the outrage police are getting out of hand. Tag suggestions are incredibly useful. If I have a library of pictures (and I do), I want software to suggest tags for them. They're my pictures, FFS.
Edit: And the law in Illinois is (to quote the article): 'The statute requires any entity that gathers biometric data—including fingerprints, voice prints, "hand or face geometry," and retinal or iris scans—to get informed consent from those individuals whose data it collects'
iPhoto says "This is a face. Would you like to type in who it is?" And Alice would type in "Bob".
Whereas Facebook uses Bob's profile information to say "Is this a photo of Bob?", leaking Bob's identity to Alice.
Calling names and swearing? Seems like you're outraged. Not them.
That feeling framed all my subsequent interactions with Facebook's burgeoning ad profiling and behavior prediction features, cloaked more artfully by FB after lesson learned not to headline their breakthroughs in computer vision. Boil we frogs on the march to normalization and surrender.
Here's one creepy correlation horror story...
I just started at a new job, so got a new email account in a new domain that I've never been associated with before.
Last week I got an ipad as a gift, set it up with my personal account on my personal domain.
Last few days, I start getting spam from apple on my work email about service offers for this new personal tablet!!
Zero relationship between the accounts or domains!
The only possible explanation is they're correlating the IP address and going by that. Very creepy.