If I’m understanding this correctly, this has nothing to do with deplatforming or freedom of speech. Although motivated by self interest, someone found DDoS-guard’s dirty laundry and aired it to LACNIC.
> The pending disruption for DDoS-Guard and Parler comes compliments of Ron Guilmette, a researcher who has made it something of a personal mission to de-platform conspiracy theorist and far-right groups.
By finding things someone or a company has done to deplatforming them, it's not deplatforming when they get deplatforming if?
Maybe try reading "The Dictator's Handbook", it might cover what your asking.
Someone used the mechanisms within LACNIC to deplatform.
> Deplatforming would be LACNIC terminating the addresses
No one is saying LACNIC deplatformed anyone, it was Ron Guilmette.
I guess it's up to you how you want to interpret reality.
Like I suggest read the book. It gets good reviews in it's own right even if you don't think the processes in the book would apply here.