I care about the censorship story. One corrupt family can't destroy a democracy, but a loss of free speech rights is guaranteed to.
Of stories you could have presented to support your narrative without concern for the fact that they have no basis in reality? Sure.
But it's the concrete example you chose. If there was a real problem, you'd think it wouldn't be hard for you to cite a real example rather than an unsourced, invented, weirdly specific claim (not “a majority” or “a large majority” but “68%”) that is readily shown to be completely in opposition to the facts.