It specifies trading activity. I read this as a warning to WSB, not their brokerages.
1. preventing people from buying GME at, whatever, $300 might not have been disadvantaging them, and
2. it might not have been unduly inhibiting their ability to trade, but duly so.
Your bias even makes you defend Robinhood’s action to disable cash accounts buying certain stocks as DULY.
Wow
Those who are anti-WSB thinks it a warning to WSB.
WSB isn't regulated, that is companies like Robinhood
Specifically calls out retail investors (i.e. WSB). I read it the opposite way, but I can see how it could be interpreted as a warning to both.
140% shorts, including naked shorts from Melvin?
RH stopping buys but allowing sells?
Conclusive proof that Citidel put their finger on the scales to force RH's actions?
WSB's members constantly chanting hold/diamond hands/ride to the moon?
There's a lot at play, and further examination will make for a good post mortem...