Fascinating that their definition of racism is explicitly racist.
In fairness to Apple, they cited the ADL as the source for their glossary of terms, and it is indeed taken verbatim from there:
https://www.adl.org/education/resources/glossary-terms/educa...
It's really mind blowing frankly that every single time the issue arises it's about 'one group' and never the rest.
Yes - there are special historical conditions, surely.
But Latino America is massive and almost completely unrepresented in most sports (outside baseball), pop culture, music, awards, politics etc..
It's an odd dynamic.
JLo is one of the only mainstream Latina stars and therefore gets the shoe-in invite to thinks like 'inauguration performances' because who else can they chose? Bruno Mars? Who else?
Even Hispaic/Latino winners at the Oscars are almost all from Mexico or Spain, with almost zero actual American representation.
There are 'massive global stars' from the Latin of course world but they generally originate from South America.
Latino/Hispanic USA has about the representation of Asian America in mainstream culture.
There are quite large sections of culture dedicated specifically to that group - news, entertainment, music etc. but it exists within it's own bubble.
The Wikipedia article on racism is much more precise and inclusive. The first paragraph makes for a useful definition. Most importantly it doesn't insult the reader's intelligence or their hardship when they where victims of racism that doesn't fit the ADL definition.
Do people not realize this kind of bullshit plays right into "replacement theory" fascist conspiracy propaganda?
It's doubly odd for this to be the ADL's definition. The majority of people would identify Jews as white. The only people I've heard explicitly state otherwise are Nazis. So for most people this definition would exclude anti-semitism from being racism.
I'm interested in what you're saying, but after some quick Googling I still don't understand the significance of "Londonderry".