You’ve spent a fair bit of time recently on HN requiring any “liberal” here to defend the most outrageous muttering of the chattering tv pundits or college professors. People who espouse views that are clearly not in line with the national party or the populace as determined by polling.

Yet when people point out an elected national official of the GOPs words. An official that far from sanction, actually has the backing of the caucus in a named vote, you defer to defending it as figurative language.

You are applying a clear double standard. One that is dangerous. You demand your opposition abide by the Queensbury rules while your team wallops the referee with a chair and sets alight our country in the process. What could she say that you’d sanction as much as you do anything Robin Diangelo does?