Define "scientific consensus", and then step back and ask yourself why anyone would elect to corrupt the scientific process with something so easily gamed. I already hear the cries of "bbbut meta analysis, science is hard!" It has nothing to do with science, it is a political phrase.
> Hardly a consensus.
Oddly missing from that are all the scientists calling both parties out for being unable to accurately predict anything, which is a pretty good sign of inaccurate attribution within the models.
> What documentary was this, "In Search of..."?
Unless he did more than one, yes. Also, enjoy the Youtube editorial flag assuring you of the opposite - because this is about science.
> FWIW, Nimoy was never a scientist, so how is that at all relevant?
Because scientists aren't playing much of a role in the messaging campaign calling for extra-national economic management.