I'm actually surprised how incremental the progress was over the last decade, with regards to CPUs and to a lesser extent GPUs. I'd strongly suggest trying to reuse older hardware instead of spending $1000+ on new one
I'm actually surprised how incremental the progress was over the last decade, with regards to CPUs and to a lesser extent GPUs. I'd strongly suggest trying to reuse older hardware instead of spending $1000+ on new one
I think you're a bit over-exaggerating here as it really depends on what you do with your PC and where you're coming from.
If you've only been running Intel this whole time and all you do is light workloads then you won't notice much progress since they haven't made much, but if do CPU demanding tasks and were to try a Ryzen 3xxx/4xxx, or better yet, a 5xxx, you'll notice a huge leap forward (if you could find one in stock, that is).
However, your "new" 7700 is a bit old in the tooth now and, despite Intel's lack of major progress, it will still be left in the dust by a newer 10th/11th gen chip.
My old faithful Intel Q6600 still serves my parents just fine after 14 years of age, but I'm not gonna pretend it isn't slow by today's standards on the modern bloated web and with all the electron crap.
You'd expect as the current console generation actually gets off the ground to start seeing more demanding upper settings, and eventually more demanding minimums.
sort of an odd thing to say when you just bought a machine with the last i7 desktop part to have only four cores. i7-7700 is only about 20% faster than an i7-2700k, but the 9700 and 10700 parts are way faster in any multi-threaded scenario.