Speaking of which, was that NP≠P paper debunked? What came of that?
Here's the "official" debunking summary on PolyMath:
http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Deolalik...
If you want to read some of the discussions, a good place to start is RJ Lipton's blog and the comments there:
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/fatal-flaws-in-deol...
There were also a few HN posts, e.g.:
But someone else should probably correct/confirm me.