I disagree that HDD manufacturers are screwing anybody over by selling in power of ten units, and bits are actually a more natural unit than bytes (the 8-bit byte is arbitrary and there have been computers with 6-bit bytes for example), but your list is fun so here are more examples:
* ISPs selling “up to” speeds.
* Screen sizes measured in inches-diagonal, without reference to aspect ratio.
* Cost of US products advertised without sales tax.
* Lots of things that “only cost X per day” to make the amount look small compared to the consumer’s monthly income.
* Supermarkets purposefully showing you price-per-unit for one product and price-per-weight for another allegedly comparable product.
* “Miles per gallon” still being used in countries where fuel is sold by the litre.
* Purposefully hard to multiply numbers used in monthly instalments. “Only 27 payments of $79!”
* Use of 9’s. “Only $999.99!”
* Food and drink manufacturers which are legally allowed to describe the quantity of an ingredient as zero if it is below a certain very small amount.
* CPUs sold as “up to X GHz” where that speed can only be sustained in specific and unmentioned thermal scenarios.
* Any product where the price is kept the same over time by decreasing the size over time, without mentioning it.
* Misdirection away from an important metric, like how AWS shouts about the great per-GB storage cost of S3 but doesn’t shout so loudly about the egress data transfer rate.
* Getting really basic now: simply putting a number in the product name to imply superiority. This is why Microsoft had to call the second Xbox the 360: because “Xbox 2” would sound less than its main competitor, the PlayStation 3.
Some of these probably go beyond the theme of misleading measurements and into the realm of my general hatred for the marketing profession.