> So if a company has a large revenue that it mostly reinvests and pays low salaries, very little tax would be paid on this revenue, and that seems okay to you?
Certainly, of course. If they reinvest then they are spending capital on something so that company so taxes are eventually paid.
This is meant, I think, to encourage growth with the intent that there will be an eventual taxable event at a higher amount than if tax was paid earlier in the stream. I think this is why tax revenues continue to grow. The intent is to maximize tax revenue. There’s no reason to worry about companies like in your scenario because it doesn’t negatively impact taxes.
What might be good is to setup thresholds for deductible expenses to prevent corporate expense that are clearly luxuries. For example, meals are only 50% deductible. I could see setting up different classifications for private jets over commercial, country club dues, luxury hotels, etc.
It doesn’t seem fair that taxpayers subsidize corporations claiming expenses and offsetting taxes on country club dues and whatnot. Pretty bizarre and there are lots of setasides that clearly benefit rich people who work for corporations.