> the provenance of the paper has been confirmed: it is indeed Schnorr.
What I read is that someone contacted Schnorr over email to get this confirmation.
I’m not saying the confirmation is wrong. And I’m not saying email cannot convey information.
What I read is that someone contacted Schnorr over email to get this confirmation.
I’m not saying the confirmation is wrong. And I’m not saying email cannot convey information.
You seem to mean something different from what your words say...
see?